Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology
Volume 26, Issue 1 , Pages 61-67, February 2009

Death by Polonium-210: lessons learned from the murder of former Soviet spy Alexander Litvinenko

  • Robin B. McFee, DO, MPH, FACPM

      Affiliations

    • Long Island Regional Poison Information Center, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York
  • ,
  • Jerrold B. Leikin, MD, FACEP, FAACT, FACP, FACOEM, FACMT

      Affiliations

    • Department of Toxicology, Northshore University HealthSystem-OMEGA, Glenbrook Hospital, Glenview, Illinois
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests and correspondence: Jerrold B. Leikin, MD, FACEP, FAACT, FACP, FACOEM, FACMT, Department of Toxicology, Northshore University HealthSystem-OMEGA, Glenbrook Hospital, 2150 Pfingsten Road, Suite 3000, Glenview, IL 60025

The medical response to radiation—whether the result of radiological warfare, terrorist deployment of improvised radiation dispersal weapons, political assassination, occupational or industrial accidents or the medically radiated patient remains one of the least taught among all disciplines within medical education. In the aftermath of 9/11 among medical vulnerabilities to toxicant threats, of all the categories of weapons of mass destruction (WMD)—whether using the CBRNE (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, explosive) or NBC (nuclear, biological, chemical) acronym—radiation is the least taught in professional schools, responder cultures or civil preparedness organizations. To date, few health care professionals (HCP) possess the fundamental knowledge or skills to identify and diagnose, let alone treat a radiation victim; this vulnerability made even more obvious in the aftermath of the high profile assassination of former Russian agent Alexander Litvinenko. He was poisoned with Polonium210. Radioactive substances are ubiquitous with radiation sources being in or transported through virtually every region nationwide. It is essential to increase preparedness among community and rural health care facilities as well as urban and university hospitals. Managing radiation injuries effectively requires access to specialized equipment and expertise. Radiation sickness is progressive and may require acute, critical and long term care throughout the course of illness. Regardless of the source, preparedness rests upon acknowledging a threat exists and dedicating the resources to address the risks including the enhancement of training and equipment. Mass or individual exposures to radiation present unique challenges to the entire response continuum from law enforcement, first responders and emergency medical care. Increased education about and practice in responding to radiological threats is essential to enhance preparedness.

Keywords: Polonium, Po210, Radiation terrorism, Nuclear terrorism, Assassination, Radiation preparedness, Weapons of mass destruction (WMD)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This article was adapted with permission from: McFee RB, Leikin JB: Death by polonium-210: lessons learned from the murder of former Soviet spy Alexander Litvinenko. JEMS 33:18-23, 2008.

PII: S0740-2570(08)00114-7

doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2008.12.003

Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology
Volume 26, Issue 1 , Pages 61-67, February 2009