Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 232-244, November 2008

Targeted therapies and biological modifiers in urologic tumors: pathobiology and clinical implications

  • Antonio Lopez–Beltran, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cordoba, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests and correspondence: Antonio Lopez-Beltran, MD, PhD, Unit of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, E-14004 Cordoba, Spain
  • ,
  • Ziya Kirkali, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
  • ,
  • Liang Cheng, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • ,
  • Lars Egevad, MD

      Affiliations

    • Tissue Biomarkers Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Juan C. Regueiro, MD

      Affiliations

    • Urology Service, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
  • ,
  • Ana Blanca, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Uro-Oncology Laborator, Biomedical Research Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
  • ,
  • Rodolfo Montironi, MD, FRCPath

      Affiliations

    • Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, Ancona, Italy

Most conventional anticancer drugs act by preventing cells from dividing or have toxic effects on dividing cells, but the toxic effects on the normal cells in the body limit the dosage to a level below that which is effective for complete response. There has been a search for more specific agents that have a much greater effect on cancer, rather than on normal cells. Several new anticancer agents are in early development, and some are in clinical practice. Many of these new therapies require histological or molecular pathological testing to determine the therapy effectiveness. Aspects of the new targeted therapies for specific cancers are therefore of increasing relevance to both molecular and anatomic pathologists, including the biology behind, the eligibility criteria (by histology or molecular assays), specimen requirements, response assessment, and biologic or histological aspects of secondary resistance. Methodologies in this field are immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization, but PCR-based methods have great potential. The role of the pathologist in applying all of these new therapeutic targets to urologic tumors remains limited at present time, but in the future it should parallel their role for other cancers where targeted therapy has been more successful. The current status of biological and clinicopathological aspects of targeted therapy in prevalent urologic tumors is reviewed.

Keywords: Targeted therapy, Renal cancer, Bladder cancer, Prostate cancer, Pathology

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0740-2570(08)00060-9

doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2008.07.006

Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 232-244, November 2008